Summary of E-835 weekly tuesday meeting 5/9/00 Present: Metreveli, Tomaradze, Obertino, Bagnasco, Lovetere, Bettoni, Menichetti, Gollwitzer, Garzoglio, Negrini, Baldini, Cibinetto, Macri, Borreani, Stancari(G), Stancari(M), Seo, Graham, Kasper, Pordes Last Week: Stephen reported what he had said at the all experimenters' meeting, viz that we had taken more than 8.4 pb-1, finished the chi0 for a while, that we were turning to the 1p1 from next three weeks, that we had taken stacks of 3.6 pb-1 and 3.3 pb-1 so far, that we are dealing with the statistics of small numbers and that we are a little concerned about the beam momentum spread; compared to a resonance with a width (gamma) of 400 keV, we have had a beam width (sigma) of about 400 keV, which corresponds to a beam-width (gamma) of ~1 MeV. At the meeting, Dave Mcginnis volunteered "we can reduce the beam-width" - the Director said "well, there you are" or something like that and so.. The stack presently in preparation: has been requested to be at 3526.7 and the source will try for a sigma width in the lab of 1.2 MeV or less(= 1200 * 0.94/3.53 in the CM = 320 keV (sigma) or 760 keV (gamma)). Keith said that there is some concern about a narrow momentum spread beam and that we may be called on to turn the gas-jet off in a hurry. IF WE ARE CALLED BY THE OPERATORS OR AP-10 TO TURN OFF THE GAS-JET, WE ARE ASKED TO RESPOND QUICKLY. THE "CLOSE THE BEAM-VALVE" IS THE PROPER BUTTON TO CLICK ON IN THE GAS-JET CONTROL PANEL. Gabriele's write-up on the jet by the jet console explains all this. The straws do not need to be turned off before closing the beam-valve if there is any rush. They should be turned off before re-opening the beam-valve and then turned on when the luminosity is stable. It would also be nice to pause the daq while the jet is off. The following stack in the current plan would be 3525.95. Stephen asked why the stacking rate this afternoon had been comparatively low (typically 2.5 mA/hr compared to the previous typical 3.5 mA/hr). Giulio said he did not know but/and that people had been working on this. Detector status: Wander recounted some of the continuing woes and work on the VLPC cryo system. Rich Schmitt has worked on the controls changing some of the "loops" and this has made for more stable temperatures but typically we do not make quite enough liquid helium to keep the main dewar from slowly emptying. Wander is in a mode where he lets the cryostat warm up a bit outside data taking time to allow the dewar to be replenished. Trigger and DAQ: Stephen asked if the Bombo effect (the ratio of neutral rates to charged rates decreases by 8% over a stack) has been further investigated. The answer was 'no'. We still do not know which (if either) is stable with the luminosity monitor. Jason said that he has not seen any problems in the neutral trigger thresholds. Wander reported that the trigger logic efficiencies as determined from the min-bias events - on disk, thankyou - are stable and around 95%. There was some discussion of the pbar-p filter - which needs to be carried to the actual implementation stage. Keith is in the process of formatting the replacemnt disk for the one which failed. Stephen asked if the replacement disks could be formatted beforehand. Keith would prefer not to. Offline: Diego said that the tracking is being tuned. Margherita has new calibration constants for the hodoscopes, including the dependence of the response with z position. Typically the H1 MIP channel has decreased by 10% to 20%, the H2 and H2' have decreased by less than 10% except for a few channels where the apparent change is larger and is being investigated. She is also using the psi' electrons to measure the theta dependence of the Cerenkov response. Michelle says that the 1p1 stacks seem to have the beam displaced about 1mm towards the debuncher compared to the chi0 runs. Presentations: Seon-Hee showed an analysis of the two 1p1 stacks. The number of psi-gamma events in each stack was the same; the number of psi-pi0 events was larger in the second than the first. Gabriele showed the off-line data for the beam parameters (energy, sigmap) of the last stack. The baby sitter kept the energy very constant except when the jet was turned off and back on. Giulio emphasized that we need to warn the control room when we are going to turn the jet-off so they can deal with the beam-cooling by hand. Stephen correction to minutes of 5/9/00 sorry...the requested energy is 3526.5 (not 3526.7)..pursuant to the narrower beam.. Stephen